The ministry of law and justice informed Parliament on Thursday that there is no woman chief justice at any high courts of the country.
As of now, there are 775 working judges, out of which, 106 are women. (ANI file image)
Women judges make up 9.5% of the total strength of high courts, the ministry said, referring to data provided by the Bar Council of India (BCI).
As of now, there are 775 working judges, out of which, 106 are women.
The government said out of 15 lakh advocates from the country, nearly 2 lakh were women, accounting for almost 15.31% of the total advocates enrolled.
Answering questions raised by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MP Rakesh Sinha, the minister of law and justice Kiren Rijiju told Parliament that so far, 11 women judges have been appointed in the Supreme Court, and only 30% of subordinate judges are female.
“The representation of women in the judiciary has increased in the last 70 years, but much distance needs to be traversed to address the needs of providing diversity in the higher courts,” Rijiju had said while attending a valedictory function at Supreme Court last year.
“Over the past seven decades of India’s journey as an independent nation, the representation of women as judges has increased,” he added.
After President Droupadi Murmu’s approval last month, the strength of judges in the top court rose to 32.
The sanctioned strength of the number of judges in the apex court is 34. Currently, the Supreme Court is functioning with 27 judges, including the Chief Justice of India.
Advertisement
According to available data, Supreme Court has to date, conferred the senior designation to over 488 advocates, of which only 19 are women.
Only 4 women were designated from the inception of the apex court in 1950 till 2013, however, 15 women have been conferred in the last 9 years.
As of 2021, the high court of Madras has the highest number of women judges (13), followed by the Bombay HC (8).
The high courts of Manipur, Meghalaya, Patna, Tripura and Uttarakhand do not have a woman judge, a report from the department of justice revealed.
The high courts of Gauhati, Himachal, Jammu & Kashmir, Ladakh, Jharkhand, Orissa, Rajasthan and Sikkim had only one woman judge, the report added.
The Delhi high court on Friday sought response of the National Commission for Protection of Child Rights (NCPCR) in a plea seeking FIR against Congress leader Rahul Gandhi for allegedly revealing the identity of a Dalit girl, who was raped and killed in 2021, and her relatives on Twitter. The child rights body said that it has informed the matter to the Supreme Court and received a notice from there, and will give its response through an affidavit.
A petition was filed against Rahul Gandhi in 2021 for allegedly revealing identity of a rape victim on Twitter.(HT)
“In 2021, Rahul Gandhi revealed the identity of a POCSO (Protection of Children from Sexual Offcences Act, 2012) victim in a tweet and a case was registered against him under Section 23 of the POCSO Act, Section 74 of the Juvenile Justice Act and Section 128 A of IPC (Indian Penal Code),” NCPCR chief Priyank Kanoongo was quoted as saying by news agency ANI.
Delhi HC bench consisting chief justice Satish Chnadra Sharma and justie Sachin Datta sent notice to the NCPCR seeking its response on the matter within four weeks.
However, the child rights body said that a formal notice has not been issued to them by the high court to file a counter-affidavit to the petition. Kanoongo said they contacted Twitter on the matter and came to know that the alleged tweet is not visible in India anymore. NCPCR earlier told the court that despite Twitter’s claim to take down Gandhi’s alleged tweet, the offence of making such disclosure survives.
Advertisement
In 2021, a petition was filed by social activist Makarand Suresh Mhadlekar claiming that the Congress leader violated the Juvenile Justie (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 and the POCSO Act, 2012, by allegedly posting the photo of victim’s patents.
The court listed the matter for further hearing on July 27.
(With ANI, PTI inputs)
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Snehashish is a content producer at Hindustan Times. A driven journalist with hands-on experience in print, digital and broadcast. A Jadavpur University alumnus who believes everything is come-at-able. …view detail
Here are today’s top news, analysis, and opinion. Know all about the latest news and other news updates from Hindustan Times.
Protestors of the Khalistan movement demonstrate outside of the Indian High Commission in London.(AP)
‘Want to see action’: India’s sharp message to UK after FIR over London protest
The Delhi Police have registered a case under several penal provisions, including India’s anti-terror law, against people involved in a violent protest by pro-Khalistan groups outside the Indian high commission in London during which an activist pulled down the national flag. Read more
‘What if…’: Vivek Agnihotri shares ‘idea’ to show solidarity to Rahul Gandhi
Filmmaker Vivek Agnihotri on Friday shared an ‘idea’ where he suggested all Congress MPs and MLAs to go for mass resignation as a sign of solidarity to Rahul Gandhi after he was disqualified today as a Lok Sabha member. Read more
Advertisement
‘Ask me about…: Raghav Chadha’s ‘Parineeti’ wordplay amid dating rumours | Watch
Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Raghav Chadha Friday brushed aside a reporter’s question on Parineeti Chopra when asked about photos of his meetings with the actor which triggered speculations of them dating. Watch here
‘One thing I admire about Hardik…’: Gujarat Titans star’s big statement on Pandya and MS Dhoni
The 2022 season of the Indian Premier League (IPL) saw Hardik Pandya getting a second lease of life in his career. Read more
Sara Ali Khan confesses she’d use divorce to guilt trip Saif Ali Khan: ‘Abba, you don’t live with us’
Advertisement
Sara Ali Khan, while promoting her new film Gaslight, has confessed that she and her younger brother, Ibrahim Ali Khan, have played up being children of divorced parents and tried to play victims against them. Read more
Advertisement
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Follow the latest breaking news and developments from India and around the world with Hindustan Times’ newsdesk. From politics and policies to the economy and the environment, from local issues to national events and global affairs, we’ve got you covered. …view detail
The Union home ministry on Friday extended for six months the “disturbed area” status in parts of Arunachal Pradesh and Nagaland under the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958.
The decisions have been taken after review of the law-and-order situation in both the states.(PTI)
According to two separate notifications, the decisions have been taken after review of the law-and-order situation in both the states.
The AFSPA gives armed forces personnel, operating in disturbed areas, sweeping powers to search, arrest, and to open fire if they deem it necessary for “maintenance of public order”.
The home ministry said the central government in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the AFSPA 1958 (28 of 1958) had declared the Tirap, Changlang and Longding districts in Arunachal Pradesh and the areas falling within the jurisdiction of Namsai and Mahadevpur police stations in Namsai district of Arunachal Pradesh, bordering the state of Assam as ‘disturbed area’ on September 30, 2022.
Advertisement
One more police station area has been brought under the ambit of the AFSPA through the fresh notification.
“And whereas a further review of the law and order situation in the state of Arunachal Pradesh has been undertaken. Now, therefore, Tirap, Changlang and Longding districts in Arunachal Pradesh and the areas falling within the jurisdiction of Namsai, Mahadevpur and Chowkham police stations in Namsai district of Arunachal Pradesh, bordering the state of Assam, are declared as ‘disturbed area’ under Section 3 of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 for a period of six months with effect from April 1, 2023, unless withdrawn earlier,” one of the notifications said.
In the other notification, the home ministry said the central government in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 3 of the AFSPA, 1958 (28 of 1958) had declared nine districts and 16 police stations in four other districts of Nagaland as ‘disturbed area’ for a period of six months with effect from October 1, 2022.
It said, now, the disturbed area status will be applicable in eight districts and 21 police stations areas falling under five other districts.
“And whereas a further review of the law and order situation in the state of Nagaland has been undertaken. Now, therefore, Dimapur, Niuland, Chumoukedima, Mon, Kiphire, Noklak, Phek and Peren districts in Nagaland and the areas in Nagaland falling within the jurisdiction of i) Khuzama, Kohima North, Kohima South, Zubza and Kezocha police stations in Kohima District; ii) Mangkolemba, Mokokchung-I, Longtho, Tuli, Longchem and Anaki ‘C’ police stations in Mokokchung District; iii) Yanglok police station in Longleng District; iv) Bhandari, Champang and Ralan police stations in Wokha District; and v) Ghatashi, Pughoboto, Satakha, Suruhuto, Zunheboto and Aghunato police stations in Zunheboto District, are declared as ‘disturbed area’ under Section 3 of the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 for a period of six months with effect from April 1, 2023, unless withdrawn earlier,” the notification said.