Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, who is in the middle of a storm over his recent remarks in the UK on Indian democracy and Parliament, on Thursday said that if “Indian democracy was functioning”, he would be allowed to speak in the House on allegations that he insulted the country abroad.
Rahul Gandhi.
At least four Union ministers have sought Gandhi’s apology over his remarks at an interaction at Cambridge University last week, when he said that Indian democracy was under attack and several politicians, including himself, were under surveillance.
“So, if Indian democracy was functioning, I would be able to say my piece in Parliament. So, actually what you are seeing is a test of Indian democracy. After four leaders of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) have made an allegation about a Member of Parliament, is the Member of Parliament going to be given the same space that those four ministers were given or is he going to be told to shut up?” Gandhi asked reporters after parliamentary proceedings were adjourned amid protests for the fourth consecutive day of the ongoing budget session.
The Wayanad MP did not get a chance to speak in the Lok Sabha on Thursday. “I went to Parliament this morning with the idea of putting (forward) what I have said or what I feel on the floor of the House. Four ministers have raised allegations against me in Parliament House, (and) it is my right to be allowed to speak on the floor of the House,” he said.
Gandhi alleged that the BJP’s protests against his remarks were about distraction and an attempt to prevent him from raising questions over American securities research firm Hindenburg Research’s report on fraud and stock manipulation by the Gautam Adani-led Adani Group. The conglomerate has denied the charges.
He alleged that the speeches of the ministers and Prime Minister Narendra Modi (during rallies in Karnataka) are to distract from the “fundamental question” of the relationship between Modi and Adani .
He added that the “ fundamental question” was “what is the relationship between the Prime Minister of India and Mr Adani and his companies and more importantly, whose money is in the shell companies? Who is this unknown person, whose money is in the shell companies? What is his relationship with Mr Adani? These are the questions.” He went on to allege that the Adani group was given loans by State Bank of India, and contracts by foreign countries, thanks to its relationship with Mr Modi.
Advertisement
Gandhi had raised most of these allegations during a debate on the President’s speech on February 2. A large part of his speech was expunged.
“What is going on here – this story started the day I gave my speech in Parliament about Mr Adani. I asked some fundamental questions to the Prime Minister about his relationship with the businessman, about how Mr Adani has been given pretty much the entire India-Israel defence relationship?” Gandhi added.
Gandhi did not take any questions from the media and said he would like to first place his statement on the floor of the House.
He quipped that unfortunately, he was an MP but later, after party leader Jairam Ramesh prodded him, said: “Unfortunately, for you , I am a Member of Parliament”.
A section of the Congress claimed that given a chance, Gandhi would launch a counterattack on the government over its alleged links with the Adani Group.
Advertisement
The BJP, however, continued its attack on the Congress leader.
Parliamentary affairs minister Pralhad Joshi said Gandhi has belittled India and that “the Opposition is making an attempt to divert attention because they know that his remarks in the UK were uncalled for.”
Joshi reiterated that Gandhi must apologise for his comments to Parliament and the Speaker.
In the Lok Sabha, commerce minister Piyush Goyal said: “The Member of the House who insulted the House of India abroad… until he apologises, responsibility should be assigned to all these (Opposition) leaders. If they don’t feel insulted and behave like this, then those who have brought the placards should be suspended.”
Former Union minister and BJP leader Ravi Shankar Prasad said Gandhi’s comments cannot become the “barometer” of the success or failure of democracy. He accused Gandhi of making it a habit of seeking to “derail and demean” Indian democracy from foreign soil.
Advertisement
Asked about the impact of Gandhi’s remarks, external affairs ministry spokesperson Arindam Bagchi said: “I don’t think this matter is in the area of foreign policy. This matter is also being raised in Parliament and it is better that I don’t comment on it. The effort from the government of India and the external affairs ministry is to share India’s image, foreign policy and perspectives with other countries so that we can take forward our interests and needs.”
Around 16 parties formed a human chain to protest against the government on Thursday morning before disrupting both Houses to demand a probe by a joint parliamentary committee (JPC) on the Adani issue.
‘Monsters…’: Mahua Moitra after BJP leaders seen on stage with Bilkis Bano’s rapistTrinamool MP Mahua Moitra (File Photo/PTI)
Shailesh Bhatt, one of the 11 convicts in the Bilkis Bano gangrape and murder case, was seen on stage with BJP MP Jasvant Sinh Bhabhor and MLA Sailesh Bhabhor. Read more
New tax regime, other rules to kick in from Apr 1: What taxpayers need to know
As is the case with each financial year (FY), the upcoming FY (2023-24) will also begin on April 1. The announcements made by finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman in the annual Feb 1 budget, too, will come into effect as part of the new financial year.Read more
Watch: Mumbai’s historic WPL title gets overshadowed by controversial Shafali Verma decision, Delhi raise question
Advertisement
Delhi fans were left irked with a controversial decision, which cost their side the wicket of explosive opener Shafali Verma.Read more
Jatin Goswami says Patna Shukla co-star Satish Kaushik wished him on Holi: ‘Huge loss personally’
In an interview with Hindustan Times, Jatin Goswami spoke about new perceptions after Gulmohar, upcoming projects and his bond with late actor Satish Kaushik. Read more
Uorfi Javed, Sunny Leone, Sayani Gupta, Guneet Monga and other stars stun at OTTPlay Changemakers Awards
OTTPlay Changemakers Awards 2023: Uorfi Javed, Sunny Leone, Sayani Gupta, Guneet Monga and other stars attended the event. Check out who wore what. Read more
Advertisement
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Follow the latest breaking news and developments from India and around the world with Hindustan Times’ newsdesk. From politics and policies to the economy and the environment, from local issues to national events and global affairs, we’ve got you covered. …view detail
The 14th Dalai Lama is a frail 87 year old who believes that he will live up to the biological age of 113 and has no immediate plans to announce his reincarnation as head of influential Gelugpa school of Tibetan Buddhism. The Communist Party of China hates him and calls him a “splittist” as President Xi Jinping pursues his Sinicization of Tibet policy with Beijing abrogating the power of official reincarnations of high lamas of the four schools of Tibetan Buddhism. Yet at this advanced age, the cancer survivor managed to bowl a googly to Beijing and clean bowled Xi Jinping regime by announcing the reincarnation of the third most senior lama or spiritual leader of Tibetan Buddhism and the head of the Gelugpa school in land-locked nation of Mongolia. The tenth Khalkha Jetsun Dhampa Rinpoche was anointed by the 14th Dalai Lama in a ceremony attended by some 600 Mongolians who travelled to Dharamshala to attend an event that has huge ramifications in this running battle between the Dalai Lama and the CPC and for survival of Tibetan Buddhism.
The 14th Dalai Lama with the Tenth Khalkha Jetsun Dhanoa Rinpoche in Dharamshala
There are unconfirmed reports that the eight year old boy, who was born in the US in 2015, was anointed as the Tenth Khalka in a ceremony at Mongolia’s biggest GandanTegchinlen Monastery in end-February. The ceremony was attended by the Abbot of the monastery and the high lamas of Mongolia. However, Tibetan Buddhism experts say that the eight year boy only got legitimacy after he was declared reincarnation on March 8, culmination of the exercise that the 14th Dalai Lama undertook when he visited Ulan Bator in 2016.
The Tenth Khalkha is one of the twin boys named Aguidau and Achiltai Attanmar and belongs to one of the richest business and political empires in Ulan Bator. The Dalai Lama institution in Dhamashala remains tight-lipped over the real identity of the new Mongolian Tibetan leader as they feel he would be targeted by the Chinese regime.
The 14th Dalai Lama with the Tenth Khalkha Jetsun Dhanoa Rinpoche in Dharamshala.
Sandwiched between “no limits” allies Russia and China, Mongolia has played a key role in the Dalai Lama Institution as it was the Mongolian King Altan Khan who offered the title of Dalai Lama (Ocean of wisdom) to third Gelugpa Lama Sonam Gyatso, who in return conferred the title of “Brahma”, the king of religion, on Khan. The fourth Dalai Lama Yonten Gyatso was born in 1589 in Mongolia to the Chokar tribal chieftain Tsultrim Cheje, who was the grandson of Altan Khan and his second wife PhaKhen Nula.
While New Delhi has left the religious matter to be sorted out between the Dalai Lama, China, and Mongolia, it is only a matter of time when Beijing starts mounting pressure on Ulan Bator for getting caught unawares. The appointment of Tenth Khalka Rinpoche means that Tibetan Buddhism gets a new lease of life in Mongolia and shows that the 14th Dalai Lama has not backed down in his fight against the Chinese Communist regime and remains a politico-religious force to reckon even in occupied Tibet. That the eight year leader of the head of Buddhist faith in Mongolia was formally anointed in India is also a message for Beijing as the battle for Tibetan plateau continues 73 years after Lhasa fell to Chinese communist forces.
Clearly the tussle between the 14th Dalai Lama and CPC will intensify after this development as the 87 year old has made it public that he will not be reborn in occupied Tibet, leaving the option open that the 15th Dalai Lama could emerge from either the Himalayan Belt or anywhere outside China.
Advertisement
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Author of Indian Mujahideen: The Enemy Within (2011, Hachette) and Himalayan Face-off: Chinese Assertion and Indian Riposte (2014, Hachette). Awarded K Subrahmanyam Prize for Strategic Studies in 2015 by Manohar Parrikar Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses (MP-IDSA) and the 2011 Ben Gurion Prize by Israel. …view detail
The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) has written a letter requesting an audience with Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud over the demand for allocating the entire 1.33-acre land granted for the top court’s archives for constructing lawyers’ chambers.
The Supreme Court. (PTI)
SCBA president Vikas Singh wrote the letter on Saturday two days after the top court dismissed a petition over the demand but left the matter open to be taken up on the administrative side.
Singh has also sought a discussion on issues including allotment of the building housing the Foreign Correspondents’ Club near the Supreme Court to the SCBA for the construction of additional chambers, space for offices for of the association’s office bearers, etc.
The SCBA has sought the entire 1.33-acre land as it is the only vacant plot situated near the Supreme Court. It argued that in the 0.5-acre space, only 250 chambers could be constructed while the requirement was for about 1000.
Advertisement
SCBA said if the entire land is available, nearly 700 chambers can be provided, still leaving out eligible lawyers awaiting chambers for 20 years.
The SCBA wrote to the Union government on March 18 demanding the space allotted to the Foreign Correspondents’ Club for additional chambers. The matter is pending and SCBA requested the CJI to take up this issue on the administrative side.
The SCBA said it filed a petition in the Supreme Court in August last year over the matter as their demand for chambers was not addressed earlier.
A bench of the CJI and justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and PS Narasimha dismissed the plea this month. “These are matters which cannot be resolved by the application of judicial standards and have to be taken up on the administrative side of the Supreme Court. Administrative functioning and decision-making, which the current issue requires, cannot be moved to the judicial side.”
Advertisement
In another letter to CJI on March 17, the SCBA said while the infrastructure for judges and registry officials has increased manifold, no corresponding increase in infrastructure took place for providing facilities for SCBA members.